Sequoia Weitman

Abstract ID: 2341
Status: Pending
Session: #42 — Impact Assessment: Back to the Future or Forward to the Past?

Summary Statement

As an early-career professional, I’ll debate Impact Assessment’s future—embracing AI and emerging assessment tools, preserving core principles, and leaving outdated "tick-the-box" practices behind.

Abstract

Impact assessment (IA) has evolved over four decades, but has it become more effective? While sophisticated models and Artificial Intelligence are transforming practice, early-career professionals enter the field confronting persistent flaws: late timing, superficial engagement, and weak consideration of alternatives and cumulative effects.

In this fast-paced intergenerational debate, I will join experienced practitioners to challenge traditional paradigms and chart the future of IA. Speaking as an early-career professional, I will explore how IA must evolve to tackle intersecting crises—from accelerating climate change and biodiversity loss to changing community expectations and the essential transition toward Indigenous-led assessment.

I will highlight key focal points:
Emerging Tools: Harnessing AI, digital modeling, and Indigenous-led evaluation methodologies to enhance real-world impact.
What to Preserve: Non-negotiable foundations, including early scoping, meaningful public participation, and rigorous alternatives analysis.
What to Leave Behind: Dense impenetrable reporting, reactive "tick-the-box" compliance, and top-down consultation.

The session will synthesise intergenerational perspectives into a forward-looking IA agenda: defining lessons to preserve, practices to retire, and capabilities to build over the next 40 years.

Presenting Author Bio

Sequoia Weitman, from Australia. Environment and planning consultant working at Sequana, with a special interest in impact assessment.

Presenting Author

Sequoia Weitman
Sequana
Australia
← Back to Submitted Abstracts